S09 · National frameworks

Proportionate consequences for misconduct across EU countries

Are there graduated, defined consequences for staff found to have misused academic authority?

National rules only; universities may provide more. Countries are alphabetical, not ranked. Rubric for this safeguard →

1 of 1 result provisional, not yet verified by a human reviewer.

What counts as national rules

“National framework” here means legislation, regulations and national quality-assurance standards reviewed by ASE; each finding's sources show which is which. Accreditation standards are expectations, not statutory duties.

Results

Results so far (1 of 27)

Too few countries for a comparison. Results are listed individually.

Proportionate consequences for misconduct: results for researched Member States, alphabetical
Country	Result	Verification	Basis in the sources
Croatia	Score 1: Limited	Provisional	ZVOZD Articles 55(3), 56(1)-(5)

Not yet researched

Not researched yet (26 of 27)

"Not yet researched" says nothing about whether a safeguard exists.

Austria: not yet researched
Belgium: not yet researched
Bulgaria: not yet researched
Cyprus: not yet researched
Czechia: not yet researched
Germany: not yet researched
Denmark: not yet researched
Estonia: not yet researched
Spain: not yet researched
Finland: not yet researched
France: not yet researched
Greece: not yet researched
Croatia: researched, provisional
Hungary: not yet researched
Ireland: not yet researched
Italy: not yet researched
Lithuania: not yet researched
Luxembourg: not yet researched
Latvia: not yet researched
Malta: not yet researched
Netherlands: not yet researched
Poland: not yet researched
Portugal: not yet researched
Romania: not yet researched
Sweden: not yet researched
Slovenia: not yet researched
Slovakia: not yet researched

List of countries not yet researched